HTML Document View

Full title: Order Sustaining Third Omnibus Objection (Non-Substantive) of the Liquidation Trustee to Certain (I) Amended and Superseded Claims, (II) Duplicative Claims, and (III) Late Filed Claims Pursuant to Section 502 of the Bankruptcy Code, Bankruptcy Rule 3007, and Local Rule 3007-1 (related document(s)[599], [608]) Signed on 12/20/2021. (Attachments: # (1) Schedule 1 # (2) Schedule 2 # (3) Schedule 3) (LMC)

Document posted on Dec 19, 2021 in the bankruptcy, 3 pages and 0 tables.

Bankrupt11 Summary (Automatically Generated)

Debtor.1 ) Re: Docket No.: 599 ) ORDER SUSTAINING THIRD OMNIBUS OBJECTION (NON-SUBSTANTIVE) OF THE LIQUIDATION TRUSTEE TO CERTAIN (I) AMENDED AND SUPERSEDED CLAIMS, (II) DUPLICATIVE CLAIMS, AND (III) LATE FILED CLAIMS PURSUANT TO SECTION 502 OF THE BANKRUPTCY CODE, BANKRUPTCY RULE 3007, AND LOCAL RULE 3007-1 Upon consideration of the third omnibus (non-substantive)objection (the “Third Omnibus Objection”)2 of the Liquidation Trustee, by which the Liquidation Trustee requests the entry of an order, pursuant to section 502 of title 11 of the United States Code, 11 U.S.C. §§ 101–1532, as amended (the “Bankruptcy Code”), Rule 3007 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the “Bankruptcy Rules”), and Rule 3007-1 of the Local Rules of Bankruptcy Practice and Procedure of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the “Local Rules”), disallowing and expunging each of the Disputed Claims identified on Schedule 1, Schedule 2, and Schedule 3 attached hereto; and upon consideration of all pleadings related to this Third Omnibus Objection; and it appearing that this Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334 and the Amended Standing Order of Reference from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, dated as of February 29, 2012; and it 1 Objection having been given under the circumstances; and this Court having considered the Third Omnibus Objection, the Michaelis Declaration, the Disputed Claims listed on Schedule 1, Schedule 2, and Schedule 3 attached hereto, and any responses thereto; and after due deliberation and sufficient cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT: 1. The Amended Claim listed under “Surviving Claim” identified on Schedule 1 annexed hereto shall remain on the Claims Register, subject to the Liquidation Trustee’s further objections on any substantive or non-substantive grounds.Nothing in the Third Omnibus Objection or this Order, nor any actions or payments made by the Liquidation Trustee pursuant to this Order, shall be construed as: (a) an admission as to the amount of, basis for, or validity of any claim against the Debtors or the Liquidation Trust under the Bankruptcy Code or other applicable nonbankruptcy law; (b) a waiver of the Liquidation Trustee’s or any other party in interest’s right to dispute any claim; (c) a promise or requirement to pay any particular claim; (d) an implication or admission that any particular claim is of a type specified or defined in this Order; (e) an admission as to the validity, priority, enforceability, or perfection of any lien on, security interest in, or other encumbrance on property of the Liquidation Trust; or (f) a waiver of any claims or causes of action which may exist against any entity under the Bankruptcy Code or any other applicable law.

List of Tables

Document Contents

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) Chapter 11 In re: ) ) Case No. 20-12088 (MFW) MEA RemainCo Holdings, LLC, et al., ) ) ) Debtor.1 ) Re: Docket No.: 599 ) ORDER SUSTAINING THIRD OMNIBUS OBJECTION (NON-SUBSTANTIVE) OF THE LIQUIDATION TRUSTEE TO CERTAIN (I) AMENDED AND SUPERSEDED CLAIMS, (II) DUPLICATIVE CLAIMS, AND (III) LATE FILED CLAIMS PURSUANT TO SECTION 502 OF THE BANKRUPTCY CODE, BANKRUPTCY RULE 3007, AND LOCAL RULE 3007-1 Upon consideration of the third omnibus (non-substantive) objection (the “Third Omnibus Objection”)2 of the Liquidation Trustee, by which the Liquidation Trustee requests the entry of an order, pursuant to section 502 of title 11 of the United States Code, 11 U.S.C. §§ 101–1532, as amended (the “Bankruptcy Code”), Rule 3007 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the “Bankruptcy Rules”), and Rule 3007-1 of the Local Rules of Bankruptcy Practice and Procedure of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the “Local Rules”), disallowing and expunging each of the Disputed Claims identified on Schedule 1, Schedule 2, and Schedule 3 attached hereto; and upon consideration of all pleadings related to this Third Omnibus Objection; and it appearing that this Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334 and the Amended Standing Order of Reference from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, dated as of February 29, 2012; and it 1 The Debtor in this chapter 11 case, along with the last four digits of its federal tax identification number, is MEA RemainCo Holdings, LLC (f/k/a Energy Alloys Holdings, LLC) (4144). The mailing address for the Debtor is c/o Terry S. Park, 3731 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 635, Los Angeles, CA 90010. 2 All capitalized terms used but otherwise not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Third Omnibus Objection.

1

appearing that this is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2); and it appearing that venue of this proceeding is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1408 and 1409; and that due and adequate notice of the Third Omnibus Objection having been given under the circumstances; and this Court having considered the Third Omnibus Objection, the Michaelis Declaration, the Disputed Claims listed on Schedule 1, Schedule 2, and Schedule 3 attached hereto, and any responses thereto; and after due deliberation and sufficient cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT: 1. The Third Omnibus Objection is SUSTAINED as set forth herein. 2. Any Response to the Third Omnibus Objection not otherwise withdrawn, resolved, or adjourned is overruled on the merits. 3. Each of the Amended Claims listed in the column titled “Disputed Claim” identified on Schedule 1 annexed hereto is disallowed and expunged in its entirety. The Amended Claim listed under “Surviving Claim” identified on Schedule 1 annexed hereto shall remain on the Claims Register, subject to the Liquidation Trustee’s further objections on any substantive or non-substantive grounds. 4. The Duplicative Claims listed in the column “Disputed Claim” identified on Schedule 2 annexed hereto are hereby disallowed and expunged in their entirety. The claims listed in the column titled “Surviving Claim” identified on Schedule 2 annexed hereto shall remain on the Claims Register, subject to the Liquidation Trustee’s further objections on any substantive or non-substantive grounds. 5. The Late Filed Claim identified on Schedule 3 to this Order is hereby disallowed and expunged in its entirety.

2

6. Epiq, the claims and noticing agent, shall update the Claims Register to reflect the relief granted in this Order. 7. The Liquidation Trustee’s objection to each Disputed Claim addressed in the Third Omnibus Objection constitutes a separate contested matter as contemplated by Bankruptcy Rule 9014. This Order shall be deemed a separate order with respect to each claim. Any stay of this Order pending appeal by any of the claimants subject to this Order shall only apply to the contested matter that involves such claimant and shall not act to stay the applicability or finality of this Order with respect to the other contested matters covered hereby. 8. Nothing in the Third Omnibus Objection or this Order, nor any actions or payments made by the Liquidation Trustee pursuant to this Order, shall be construed as: (a) an admission as to the amount of, basis for, or validity of any claim against the Debtors or the Liquidation Trust under the Bankruptcy Code or other applicable nonbankruptcy law; (b) a waiver of the Liquidation Trustee’s or any other party in interest’s right to dispute any claim; (c) a promise or requirement to pay any particular claim; (d) an implication or admission that any particular claim is of a type specified or defined in this Order; (e) an admission as to the validity, priority, enforceability, or perfection of any lien on, security interest in, or other encumbrance on property of the Liquidation Trust; or (f) a waiver of any claims or causes of action which may exist against any entity under the Bankruptcy Code or any other applicable law. 9. This Order is immediately effective and enforceable. 10. This Court retains jurisdiction with respect to all matters arising from or related to the implementation of this Order. Dated: December 20th, 2021 MARY F. WALRATH Wilmington, Delaware UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE

3