HTML Document View

Full title: Third Stipulation, Third Stipulation Regarding Proof Of Claim No. 107 Filed On Or Behalf Of The California Franchise Tax Board Filed by Debtor Wave Computing, Inc. (RE: related document(s)643 Objection to Claim filed by Debtor Wave Computing, Inc., 717 Response filed by Creditor California Franchise Tax Board, 781 Order on Stipulation). (Harris, Robert) (Entered: 03/25/2021)

Document posted on Mar 24, 2021 in the bankruptcy, 6 pages and 0 tables.

Bankrupt11 Summary (Automatically Generated)

26 /// 27 1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases are Wave Computing, Inc., MIPS Tech, Inc., Hellosoft, IncWave Computing (UK) Limited, Imagination Technologies, Inc., Caustic Graphics, Inc., and MIP28 1 RECITALS 2 WHEREAS on October 21, 2020, the Debtors filed the Debtors’ Objection to Claim on Behaof the California Franchise Tax Board [Docket No. 643] (the “Claim Objection”), objecting to, amon3 other things, the FTB’s proof of claim no.Except as expressly set forth in this Stipulation, nothing contained herein shall be a13 admission or a waiver of the substantive or procedural rights, remedies, claims, or defenses of any othe Parties, including the Parties’ right to request further extensions of the periods set forth herein, o14 the Debtors right to file further claim objections.18 19 Upon the stipulation (the “Stipulation”),2 dated March 23, 2021 of Wave Computing, Inc. an 20 its debtor affiliates, as debtors and debtors in possession (collectively, the “Debtors”) in th21 above-captioned chapter 11 cases and California Franchise Tax Board (“FTB,” and together with th22 Debtors, the “Parties”); and the relief requested in the Stipulation being in the best interests of th23 Debtors’ estates, their creditors and other parties in interest; and after due deliberation and sufficie24 cause appearing therefor, 25 1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases are Wave Computing, Inc., MIPS Tech, Inc., Hellosoft, Inc26

Page 1

1 BINDER & MALTER, LLP Michael W. Malter (SBN 96533) 2 Robert G. Harris (SBN 124678) 2775 Park Avenue, 3 Santa Clara CA 95050 Telephone: 408.295.1700 4 Facsimile: 408.295.1531 Email: michael@bindermalter.com 5 Email: rob@bindermalter.com 6 Attorneys for the Reorganized Debtors 7 8 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 In re: ) Case No. 20-50682 (MEH) ) 12 WAVE COMPUTING, INC., et al., ) Chapter 11 (Jointly Administered) ) 13 Debtors.1 ) THIRD STIPULATION REGARDING 14 ) PROOF OF CLAIM NO. 107 FILED ON ) OR BEHALF OF THE CALIFORNIA 15 ) FRANCHISE TAX BOARD ) 16 ) Related Docket Nos. 643, 717, 781 ) 17 ) [No Hearing Requested] ) 18 ) 19 20 This stipulation (the “Stipulation”) is made and entered into by and between Wave Computin21 Inc. (“Wave”) and its debtor affiliates, as reorganized debtors (collectively, the “Debtors”) an22 California Franchise Tax Board (“FTB,” and together with the Debtors, the “Parties”), by and throug23 their respective undersigned counsel. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases are Wave Computing, Inc., MIPS Tech, Inc., Hellosoft, IncWave Computing (UK) Limited, Imagination Technologies, Inc., Caustic Graphics, Inc., and MIP28

Page 2

1 RECITALS 2 WHEREAS on October 21, 2020, the Debtors filed the Debtors’ Objection to Claim on Behaof the California Franchise Tax Board [Docket No. 643] (the “Claim Objection”), objecting to, amon3 other things, the FTB’s proof of claim no. 107 (“FTB Claim”);2 4 WHEREAS on November 6, 2020, the FTB filed the Response of California Franchise Ta5 Board to Debtors’ Objection Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 502(b) to Claim No. 107 [Docket No. 717] (th“FTB Response”); 6 WHEREAS on November 13, 2020, the Parties entered into the first stipulation Regardin7 Proof of Claim No. 107 Filed On Or Behalf of the California Franchise Tax Board [Docket No. 74(the “First Stipulation”); 8 9 WHEREAS on November 16, 2020, the Court approved the First Stipulation [Docket N781], which set the following deadlines: 10 (i) the date of the preliminary hearing on the Claim Objection is 11 February 25, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. (Pacific Time); 12 (ii) the deadline for the Debtors to file a reply in support of the Claim 13 Objection is the later of (a) February 4, 2021 at 4:00 p.m. (Pacific Time) or (b) forty-five (45) days from the date that the 14 FTB issues its protest determination; and 15 (iii) FTB’s deadline to file a sur-reply in support of the FTB Response is 4:00 p.m. (Pacific Time) seven (7) days prior to the 16 Preliminary Hearing; 17 WHEREAS on February 24, 2021, the Parties entered into the second stipulation Regardin18 Proof of Claim No. 107 Filed On Or Behalf of the California Franchise Tax Board [Docket No. 120(the “Second Stipulation”); 19 WHEREAS on February 25, 2021, the Court approved the Second Stipulation [Docket N20 1215], which set the following deadlines: 21 (i) the date of the preliminary hearing on the Claim Objection is 22 April 28, 2021 at 10:15 a.m. (Pacific Time); 23 (ii) the deadline for the Debtors to file a reply in support of the Claim Objection is 21 days prior to the hearing; and 24 (iii) FTB’s deadline to file a sur-reply in support of the FTB 25 Response is 7 days prior to the Preliminary Hearing; and 26 27 2 The Proof of Claim is referred to in the register maintained by Donlin Recano & Company as ClaiNo. 107, but is referred to in the register maintained by the Court as Claim No. 5-1 in In re MIPS Tec

Page 3

1 (iv) The Parties are to file a joint status report 7 day before the hearing. 2 WHEREAS the Parties have agreed to continue the Claim Objection in accordance with th3 terms set forth herein and in the proposed order attached hereto as Exhibit A (the “Order”). 4 NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated and agreed by the Parties: 5 1. The Parties will continue the preliminary hearing on the Claim Objection to May 27, 2026 at 10:00 a.m. (the “Preliminary Hearing”). 7 2. The Debtors’ deadline to file a reply in support of the Claim Objection is continued to date twenty-one (21) days in advance of the Preliminary Hearing. 8 3. FTB may file a sur-reply in support of the FTB Response on or before the date seven (9 days in advance of the Preliminary Hearing. 10 4. The Parties shall file a joint status report with the Court seven (7) days prior to th11 Preliminary Hearing, outlining an agreed upon discovery plan, or if no agreement can be reached, thParties’ positions with respect to a discovery plan. 12 5. Except as expressly set forth in this Stipulation, nothing contained herein shall be a13 admission or a waiver of the substantive or procedural rights, remedies, claims, or defenses of any othe Parties, including the Parties’ right to request further extensions of the periods set forth herein, o14 the Debtors right to file further claim objections. 15 6. The Bankruptcy Court shall retain jurisdiction with respect to all matters arising from o16 related to the implementation, interpretation, or enforcement of this Stipulation and the Order. 17 SO STIPULATED: 18 19 Dated: March 23, 2021 20 /s/ Cara M. Porter /s/_Robert G. Harris _______ Cara M. Porter Robert G. Harris 21 Deputy Attorney General 22 Xavier Becerra Attorneys for the Reorganized Debtors Attorney General of California 23 Attorney for the California 24 Franchise Tax Board 25 26 27

Page 4

1 EXHIBIT A 2 Proposed Order 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Page 5

1 BINDER & MALTER, LLP Michael W. Malter (SBN 96533) 2 Robert G. Harris (SBN 124678) 2775 Park Avenue, 3 Santa Clara CA 95050 Telephone: 408.295.1700 4 Facsimile: 408.295.1531 Email: michael@bindermalter.com 5 Email: rob@bindermalter.com 6 Attorneys for the Reorganized Debtors 7 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION 10 In re: ) Case No. 20-50682 (MEH) 11 ) WAVE COMPUTING, INC., et al., ) 12 Chapter 11 (Jointly Administered) ) 13 Debtors.1 ) ORDER APPROVING THIRD ) STIPULATION REGARDING PROOF O 14 ) CLAIM NO. 107 FILED ON OR BEHALF ) OF THE CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TA 15 ) BOARD ) 16 ) Related Docket Nos. 643, 717, 781 ) 17 ) [No Hearing Requested] ) 18 19 Upon the stipulation (the “Stipulation”),2 dated March 23, 2021 of Wave Computing, Inc. an 20 its debtor affiliates, as debtors and debtors in possession (collectively, the “Debtors”) in th21 above-captioned chapter 11 cases and California Franchise Tax Board (“FTB,” and together with th22 Debtors, the “Parties”); and the relief requested in the Stipulation being in the best interests of th23 Debtors’ estates, their creditors and other parties in interest; and after due deliberation and sufficie24 cause appearing therefor, 25 1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases are Wave Computing, Inc., MIPS Tech, Inc., Hellosoft, Inc26 Wave Computing (UK) Limited, Imagination Technologies, Inc., Caustic Graphics, Inc., and MIPTech, LLC. The Debtors’ mailing address is 3201 Scott Blvd, Santa Clara, CA 95054. 27 2 Each capitalized term used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to it i28

Page 6

1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 2 1. The Stipulation is approved. 3 2. The Preliminary Hearing on the Claim Objection is continued to May 27, 2021 at 10 a. 4 3. The Debtors’ deadline to file a reply in support of the Claim Objection is continued a dat5 twenty-one (21) days in advance of the Preliminary Hearing. 6 4. FTB may file a sur-reply in support of the FTB Response on or before the date seven (77 days in advance of the Preliminary Hearing. 8 5. The Parties shall file a joint status report seven (7) days prior to the Preliminary Hearin9 outlining an agreed upon discovery plan, or if no agreement can be reached, the Parties’ positions wit10 respect to a discovery plan. 11 6. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to hear and determine all matters arising from or relate12 to the implementation, interpretation, or enforcement of the Stipulation or this Order. 13 14 ***** END OF ORDER **** 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27