HTML Document View

Full title: Order Approving Stipulation Regarding Proof Of Claim No. 107 Filed On Or Behalf Of The California Franchise Tax Board (RE: related document(s)643 Objection to Claim filed by Debtor Wave Computing, Inc., 1208 Stipulation to Approve Document filed by Debtor Wave Computing, Inc.). (acr) (Entered: 02/25/2021)

Document posted on Feb 24, 2021 in the bankruptcy, 3 pages and 0 tables.

Bankrupt11 Summary (Automatically Generated)

19 WAVE COMPUTING, INC., et al., ) ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION 21 ) REGARDING PROOF OF CLAIM NO. ) 107 FILED ON OR BEHALF OF THE 22 ) The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases are Wave Computing, Inc., MIPS Tech, Inc., Hellosoft, I 1Upon the stipulation (the “Stipulation”),1 dated February 24, 2021 of Wave Computing, I2 and its debtor affiliates, as debtors and debtors in possession (collectively, the “Debtors”) in 3 above-captioned chapter 11 cases and California Franchise Tax Board (“FTB,” and together with 4 Debtors, the “Parties”); and the relief requested in the Stipulation being in the best interests of 5 Debtors’ estates, their creditors and other parties in interest; and after due deliberation and suffici6 cause appearing therefor, 7The Parties shall file a joint status report seven (7) days prior to the Preliminary Heari16 outlining an agreed upon discovery plan, or if no agreement can be reached, the Parties’ positions 17 respect to a discovery plan.

Page 1

1 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP Samuel A. Newman (SBN 217042) 2 (sam.newman@sidley.com) The following constitutes the order of the Court. Genevieve G. Weiner (SBN 254272) Signed: February 25, 2021 3 (gweiner@sidley.com) Julia Philips Roth (SBN 324987) 4 (julia.roth@sidley.com) 555 West Fifth Street 5 Los Angeles, CA 90013 _________________________________________________ Telephone: 213.896.6000 M. Elaine Hammond 6 Facsimile: 213.896.6600 U.S. Bankruptcy Judge 7 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP Charles M. Persons (admitted pro hac vice) 8 (cpersons@sidley.com) Juliana Hoffman (admitted pro hac vice) 9 (jhoffman@sidley.com) Jeri Leigh Miller (admitted pro hac vice) 10 (jeri.miller@sidley.com) 2021 McKinney Avenue 11 Suite 2000 Dallas, TX 75201 12 Telephone: 214.981.3300 Facsimile: 214.981.3400 13 Attorneys for Debtors and Debtors in 14 Possession 15 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 SAN JOSE DIVISION 18 In re: ) Case No. 20-50682 (MEH) ) 19 WAVE COMPUTING, INC., et al., ) Chapter 11 (Jointly Administered) ) 20 Debtors.1 ) ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION 21 ) REGARDING PROOF OF CLAIM NO. ) 107 FILED ON OR BEHALF OF THE 22 ) CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOA ) 23 ) Related Docket Nos. 643, 717, 781, 1208 ) 24 Continued Hearing: Date: 04/28/21 25 Time: 10:15 a.m. Judge: Hon. M. Elaine Hammond 26 via Tele/Videoconference 27 1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases are Wave Computing, Inc., MIPS Tech, Inc., Hellosoft, I

Page 2

1 Upon the stipulation (the “Stipulation”),1 dated February 24, 2021 of Wave Computing, I2 and its debtor affiliates, as debtors and debtors in possession (collectively, the “Debtors”) in 3 above-captioned chapter 11 cases and California Franchise Tax Board (“FTB,” and together with 4 Debtors, the “Parties”); and the relief requested in the Stipulation being in the best interests of 5 Debtors’ estates, their creditors and other parties in interest; and after due deliberation and suffici6 cause appearing therefor, 7 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 8 1. The Stipulation is approved. 9 2. The Preliminary Hearing on the Claim Objection is continued to April 28, 2021 at 10 10:15 a.m. 11 3. The Debtors’ deadline to file a reply in support of the Claim Objection is continued a d12 twenty-one (21) days in advance of the Preliminary Hearing. 13 4. FTB may file a sur-reply in support of the FTB Response on or before the date seven 14 days in advance of the Preliminary Hearing. 15 5. The Parties shall file a joint status report seven (7) days prior to the Preliminary Heari16 outlining an agreed upon discovery plan, or if no agreement can be reached, the Parties’ positions 17 respect to a discovery plan. 18 6. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to hear and determine all matters arising from or rela19 to the implementation, interpretation, or enforcement of the Stipulation or this Order. 20 ** END OF ORDER ** 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 Each capitalized term used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to i

Page 3

1 COURT SERVICE LIST 2 ECF Parties by ECF 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27