HTML Document View

Full title: Stipulation to Approve Document Third Stipulation and Proposed Order Regarding Synopsys Cure Objection Filed by Debtor Wave Computing, Inc. (RE: related document(s)951 Notice filed by Debtor Wave Computing, Inc., 1008 Objection filed by Creditor Synopsys Inc., 1024 Stipulation to Approve Document filed by Debtor Wave Computing, Inc., 1029 Order on Stipulation). (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A) (Miller, Jeri) (Entered: 02/05/2021)

Document posted on Feb 4, 2021 in the bankruptcy, 3 pages and 0 tables.

Bankrupt11 Summary (Automatically Generated)

Case No. 20-50682 (MEH) ) 20 WAVE COMPUTING, INC., et al., ) 27 1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases are Wave Computing, Inc., MIPS Tech, Inc., Hellosoft, IncWave Computing (UK) Limited, Imagination Technologies, Inc., Caustic Graphics, Inc., and MIP 1 WHEREAS on December 21, 2020, the Debtors filed the Notice of Possible Assumption anAssignment and Cure Amounts with Respect to the Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases of th7 Debtors [Docket No. 951]WHEREAS the Notice set the deadline of December 31, 2020 at 4:00 p.m. (Pacific Time) fothe contract counterparties listed on Exhibit A to object to (i) the proposed assumption, assignmen10 or potential designation of such party’s contract; (ii) the applicable cure amount; or (iii) the provisioof adequate assurance of future performance (the “Objection Deadline”); 11 WHEREAS counsel for the Parties are engaged in ongoing discussions regarding the issue22 raised in the Objection and, in connection with these discussions, the Parties have agreed to furthe23 extend the hearing on the Objection and the deadline for the Debtors’ reply to the Objection iaccordance with the terms set forth herein and in the proposed order attached hereto as Exhibit A (th24 “Order”).

Page 1

1 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP Samuel A. Newman (SBN 217042) 2 (sam.newman@sidley.com) Genevieve G. Weiner (SBN 254272) 3 (gweiner@sidley.com) Julia Philips Roth (SBN 324987) 4 (julia.roth@sidley.com) 555 West Fifth Street 5 Los Angeles, CA 90013 Telephone: 213.896.6000 6 Facsimile: 213.896.6600 7 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP Charles M. Persons (admitted pro hac vice) 8 (cpersons@sidley.com) Juliana Hoffman (admitted pro hac vice) 9 (jhoffman@sidley.com) Jeri Leigh Miller (admitted pro hac vice) 10 (jeri.miller@sidley.com) 2021 McKinney Avenue 11 Suite 2000 Dallas, TX 75201 12 Telephone: 214.981.3300 Facsimile: 214.981.3400 13 Attorneys for Debtors and Debtors in 14 Possession 15 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 SAN JOSE DIVISION 18 19 In re: ) Case No. 20-50682 (MEH) ) 20 WAVE COMPUTING, INC., et al., ) Chapter 11 (Jointly Administered) ) 21 Debtors.1 ) THIRD STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ) 22 ORDER REGARDING SYNOPSYS CUR ) OBJECTION 23 ) ) Related to Docket Nos.: 951, 1008, 1024, 24 ) 1029 ) 25 ) [No Hearing Requested] 26 27 1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases are Wave Computing, Inc., MIPS Tech, Inc., Hellosoft, IncWave Computing (UK) Limited, Imagination Technologies, Inc., Caustic Graphics, Inc., and MIP

Page 2

1 This stipulation (the “Stipulation”) is made and entered into by and between Wave Computin2 Inc. (“Wave”) and its debtor affiliates, as debtors and debtors-in-possession (collectivel3 the “Debtors”) and Synopsys, Inc. (“Synopsys,” and together with the Debtors, the “Parties”), by an4 through their respective undersigned counsel. 5 RECITALS 6 WHEREAS on December 21, 2020, the Debtors filed the Notice of Possible Assumption anAssignment and Cure Amounts with Respect to the Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases of th7 Debtors [Docket No. 951] (the “Notice”), which included as Exhibit A a list of contracts that may b8 assumed as well as the proposed cure amount associated with each; 9 WHEREAS the Notice set the deadline of December 31, 2020 at 4:00 p.m. (Pacific Time) fothe contract counterparties listed on Exhibit A to object to (i) the proposed assumption, assignmen10 or potential designation of such party’s contract; (ii) the applicable cure amount; or (iii) the provisioof adequate assurance of future performance (the “Objection Deadline”); 11 WHEREAS the Debtors agreed to extend the Objection Deadline for Synopsys to January 12 2021; 13 WHEREAS on January 4, 2021, Synopsys filed a limited objection and reservation of right14 in response to the Notice [Docket No. 1008] (the “Objection”); 15 WHEREAS on January 8, 2021, the Parties entered into the Stipulation and Proposed OrdeRegarding Synopsys Cure Objection [Docket No. 1024] (the “First Stipulation”), approved by th16 Bankruptcy Court on January 11, 2021 [Docket No. 1029], which provided that the Debtors would filtheir reply to the Objection by February 3, 2021, and that the hearing on the Objection, along with th17 Debtors’ reply, would be held on February 10, 2021 at 10:15 a.m. (Pacific Time); 18 WHEREAS on February 3, 2021, the Parties entered into the Second Stipulation and Propose19 Order Regarding Synopsys Cure Objection [Docket No. 1024] (the “Second Stipulation”), approveby the Bankruptcy Court on February 4, 2021 [Docket No. 1121], which provided that the Debtor20 would file their reply to the Objection by February 5, 2021, and that the hearing on the Objectioalong with the Debtors’ reply, would be held on February 10, 2021 at 10:15 a.m. (Pacific Time); 21 WHEREAS counsel for the Parties are engaged in ongoing discussions regarding the issue22 raised in the Objection and, in connection with these discussions, the Parties have agreed to furthe23 extend the hearing on the Objection and the deadline for the Debtors’ reply to the Objection iaccordance with the terms set forth herein and in the proposed order attached hereto as Exhibit A (th24 “Order”). 25 NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated and agreed by the Parties: 26 1. The hearing on the Objection shall be continued to the next omnibus hearing date to bheld in March 2021, consistent with the Court’s schedule and availability (the “March Omnibu27 Hearing Date”).

Page 3

1 2. The deadline for the Debtors to file a reply to the Objection shall be seven (7) days iadvance of the March Omnibus Hearing Date. 2 3. Except as expressly set forth in this Stipulation, nothing contained herein shall be a3 admission or a waiver of the substantive or procedural rights, remedies, claims, or defenses of any othe Parties. 4 5 4. The Bankruptcy Court shall retain jurisdiction with respect to all matters arising froor related to the implementation, interpretation, or enforcement of this Stipulation and the Order. 6 7 SO STIPULATED: 8 9 SCHWARTZ & CERA CALIFORNIA PC SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 10 /s/ Petra M. Reinecke /s/ Jeri Leigh Miller 11 Petra M. Reinecke Samuel A. Newman 12 Genevieve G. Weiner Attorneys for Synopsys, Inc. Jeri Leigh Miller 13 Attorneys for Debtors and Debtors in 14 Possession 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27