HTML Document View

Full title: Application for compensation FIRST AND FINAL APPLICATION OF PACHULSKI STANG ZIEHL & JONES LLP AS COUNSEL TO THE OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS FOR ALLOWANCE OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE CLAIM FOR COMPENSATION AND FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES INCURRED FOR THE PERIOD FROM NOVEMBER 18, 2020 THROUGH APRIL 15, 2021 for Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP, Creditor Comm. Aty, Period: 11/18/2020 to 4/15/2021, Fee: $484918.00, Expenses: $2282.94. Filed by Ryan E. Manns, Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP Objections due by 6/22/2021. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A-1 # 2 Exhibit A-2 # 3 Exhibit A-3 # 4 Exhibit B # 5 Exhibit C # 6 Exhibit D # 7 Exhibit E # 8 Exhibit F # 9 Exhibit G) (Manns, Ryan)

Document posted on May 31, 2021 in the bankruptcy, 26 pages and 0 tables.

Bankrupt11 Summary (Automatically Generated)

PSZJ requests that the Court enter an order (the “Order”), substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit G: (a) awarding PSZJ final compensation for professional services provided during the Final Fee Period in the amount of $484,918.00 and reimbursement of expenses in the amount of $2,282.94; (b) authorizing and directing the Debtors to remit payment to PSZJ for such fees and expenses; (d) approving fees and expenses incurred by PSZJ for the period from November 18, 2020 through and including March 31, 2021 and the Stub Period on final basis; and (d) granting such other relief as is appropriate under the circumstances.During the Final Fee Period, the Firm, among other things: (1) maintained a work-in-progress memorandum and prepared for and participated in conferences regarding work-in-progress issues; (2) performed work regarding pro hac vice motions; (3) corresponded and conferred regarding case administration issues; (4) performed work regarding Committee by-laws; (5) performed work regarding a notice of appearance; (6) maintained a memorandum of critical dates; (7) performed work regarding the selection of Committee financial advisors; (8) performed work regarding a memorandum of pending motions; (9) performed work regarding a Committee information motion; (10) performed work regarding a weekly summary of pleadings; (11) prepared for and participated in telephonic conferences with attorneys for the Debtors regarding case status issues; (12) reviewed and analyzed issues regarding Second Day Motions; (13) reviewed and analyzed discovery issues; (14) reviewed and analyzed financing and sale issues; and (15) prepared for and participated in telephonic conferences with the Committee and the Debtors’ professionals regarding case status issues. During the Final Fee Period, the Firm, among other things: (1) reviewed and analyzed pleadings and drafted a memorandum of DIP loan issues; (2) performed work regarding a DIP loan objection; (3) performed work regarding a final DIP financing order; (4) reviewed and analyzed budget issues; (5) reviewed and analyzed issues regarding cash flow projections; (6) reviewed and analyzed lien and prepared a lien perfection memorandum; (7) prepared lien challenge stipulation; (8) reviewed and analyzed DIP financing amendment; and (9) corresponded and conferred regarding financing issues. During the Final Fee Period, the Firm, among other things: (1) performed work regarding the selection of a Committee financial advisor; (2) prepared for and participated in weekly status calls with the Committee and its professionals; (3) communicated with Committee members regarding case status issues; (4) prepared for and attended teleconferences with the Debtors’ professionals regarding case issues; (5) performed work regarding case update memoranda for the Committee; (6) performed work regarding a creditor website; (7) reviewed and analyzed case updates from Dundon; (8) revi

List of Tables

Document Contents

Jeffrey N. Pomerantz (admitted pro hac vice) Kristian W. Gluck (SBT 24038921) Maxim B. Litvak (SBT 24002482) Ryan E. Manns (SBT 24041391) PACHULSKI STANG ZIEHL & JONES LLP Laura L. Smith (SBT 24066039) 10100 Santa Monica Boulevard, 13th Floor NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT US LLP Los Angeles, CA 90067 2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 3600 Tel: (310) 277-6910 Dallas, TX 75201-7932 Facsimile: (310) 201-0760 Telephone: (214) 855-8000 jpomerantz@pszjlaw.com Facsimile: (214) 855-8200 mlitvak@pszjlaw.com kristian.gluck@nortonrosefulbright.com ryan.manns@nortonrosefulbright.com Robert J. Feinstein (admitted pro hac vice) laura.smith@nortonrosefulbright.com Steven W. Golden (SBT 24099681) PACHULSKI STANG ZIEHL & JONES LLP 780 Third Avenue, 34th Floor New York, NY 10017 rfeinstein@pszjlaw.com sgolden@pszjlaw.com Tel: (212) 561-7700 Facsimile: (212) 561-7777 Counsel for the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION In re: § Case No. 20-32633-SGJ § STUDIO MOVIE GRILL HOLDINGS, LLC, et al.,1 § Chapter 11 § Debtors. § Jointly Administered FIRST AND FINAL APPLICATION OF PACHULSKI STANG ZIEHL & JONES LLP AS COUNSEL TO THE OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS FOR ALLOWANCE OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE CLAIM FOR COMPENSATION AND FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES INCURRED FOR THE PERIOD FROM NOVEMBER 18, 2020 THROUGH APRIL 15, 2021 1 A complete list of the Debtors in these chapter 11 cases may be obtained on the website of the Debtors’ claims and noticing agent at https://www.donlinrecano.com/Clients/smgh/Index

1

A HEARING WILL BE CONDUCTED ON THIS MATTER ON THURSDAY, _______, 2021, AT ____.M., AT THE EARL CABELL FEDERAL BUILDING, 1100 COMMERCE STREET, 14TH FLOOR, COURTROOM #3, DALLAS, TEXAS. IF YOU OBJECT TO THE RELIEF REQUESTED, YOU MUST RESPOND IN WRITING, SPECIFICALLY ANSWERING EACH PARAGRAPH OF THIS PLEADING. UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE COURT, YOU MUST FILE YOUR RESPONSE WITH THE CLERK OF THE BANKRUPTCY COURT BY _____, 2021. YOU MUST SERVE A COPY OF YOUR RESPONSE ON THE PERSON WHO SENT YOU THE NOTICE; OTHERWISE, THE COURT MAY TREAT THE PLEADING AS UNOPPOSED AND GRANT THE RELIEF REQUESTED. SUMMARY SHEET
Table 1 on page 2. Back to List of Tables
Name of Applicant: Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP None
Applicant’s Role in Case Counsel to the Official Committee of
Unsecured Creditors
None
Date Order of Employment Signed: January 11, 2021 [Docket No. 425] None
Time Period Covered by this Statement: Beginning of
Period
End of Period
None November 18, 2020 April 15, 2021
Time Period Covered by any Prior Applications: N/A N/A
Total Amounts Awarded in All Prior Applications: $0.00 None
Total Fees Requested in this Final Application: $484,918.00 None
Total Professional Fees Requested in this Final
Application:
$455,474.50 None
Total Actual Professional Hours Covered by this
Final Application:
472.80 None
Average Hourly Rate for Professionals: $963.36 None
Total Paraprofessional Fees Requested in this Final
Application:
$29,443.50 None
Total Actual Paraprofessional Hours Covered by
this Final Application:
66.90 None
Average Hourly Rate for Paraprofessionals: $440.11 None
Reimbursable Expenses Sought in this Final
Application:
$2,282.94 None

2

Table 1 on page 3. Back to List of Tables
Name of Applicant: Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP
Additional Estimated Fees for April 16, 2021 –
June 1, 2021 (which will be supplemented prior to
the hearing on this Application)
$30,000.00
Total Amounts Requested in this Final Application $487,200.94
Date of Confirmation Hearing: March 26, 2021
Indicate whether the Plan has been confirmed. Yes

3

Summary of Interim Compensation Paid
Table 1 on page 4. Back to List of Tables
To Date
(Excluding Current (Stub)
Period)
Current (Stub) Period
Total Fees Requested: $477,390.50 $7,527.50
Total Expenses Requested: $2,251.82 $31.12
Total Disbursements Requested: $479,642.32 $7,558.62
Total Disbursements Paid: $290,417.95 $0.00

4

TO THE HONORABLE STACEY G. JERNIGAN, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE: Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP (“PSZJ” or the “Firm”), counsel for the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (the “Committee”) of Studio Movie Grill Holdings, LLC, et al. (the “Debtors”), hereby submits its first and final application (the “Final Application”) for final allowance of compensation for professional services provided in the amount of $484,918.00 and reimbursement of expenses incurred in the amount of $2,282.94 for the period of November 15, 2020 through and including April 15, 2021 (the “Final Fee Period”). In support of this Final Application, PSZJ respectfully states as follows: INTRODUCTION 1. During the pendency of these cases, the Committee was instrumental in the reaching of a global case resolution that is embodied in the terms of the Plan and will provide a dedicated pool of assets available for allowed general unsecured claim holders. The resolution that resulted from the Committee’s efforts: (i) provided holders of Class 5 Allowed GUC Claims their pro rata share of $1.0 million in cash net of expenses and the net proceeds of recovery from a pending lawsuit against Pantera on the terms set forth in the Plan; (ii) provided holders of Allowed Class 6 Convenience Claims a 10% recovery in cash; and (iii) provided that all general unsecured creditors will receive the benefit of the Debtors’ waiver of all avoidance actions, notably including preference actions. JURISDICTION 2. The United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (the “District Court”) has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this Application pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334. The District Court’s jurisdiction has been referred to this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157 and the District Court’s Miscellaneous Order No. 33, Order of Reference of Bankruptcy

5

Cases and Proceedings Nunc Pro Tunc dated August 3, 1984. This is a core matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b), which may be heard and finally determined by this Court. 3. Venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1408 and 1409. 4. This Application is made pursuant to Sections 327, 330, and 1103 of chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), Rule 2016 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the “Bankruptcy Rules”), and Rule 2016-1 of the Local Bankruptcy Rules of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas (the “Local Rules”). BACKGROUND 5. On October 23, 2020 (the “Petition Date”), each of the Debtors filed a voluntary petition with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas (the “Court”) under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. The Debtors operated their businesses and managed their properties as debtors in possession pursuant to sections 1107(a) and 1108 of the Bankruptcy Code. No trustee or examiner has been appointed in these cases. 6. On November 16, 2020, the Office of the United States Trustee appointed the Committee pursuant to section 1102 of the Bankruptcy Code. The Committee consisted of the following five (5) members: (i) Michael Esqueda; (ii) Segars Group LLC; (iii) BwanaTheater Partners, LLC; (iv) Spirit Realty, L.P.; and (v) Performance Food Group, Inc. 7. On November 18, 2020, the Committee held a meeting and, among other things, voted to retain the Firm as its lead counsel, subject to Court approval. 8. January 11, 2021, the Court entered the Order Authorizing and Approving the Employment of Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as Lead Counsel to the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of the Debtors Effective as of November 18, 2020 [Docket No. 425] (the “Retention Order”).

6

9. The Retention Order authorizes the Debtors to compensate and reimburse PSZJ in accordance with the Bankruptcy Code, the Bankruptcy Rules, the Local Rules, and any Orders entered in these cases. The Retention Order also authorizes the compensation of PSZJ at its standard hourly rates and the reimbursement of PSZJ’s actual and necessary out-of-pocket expenses incurred, subject to application to this Court. 10. On March 31, 2021, the Court entered the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order Confirming the Debtors’ Fourth Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization [Docket No. 875] (the “Confirmation Order”). The Fourth Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization for Studio Movie Grill Holdings, LLC and Jointly Administered Debtors (the “Plan”) became effective by its terms on April 15, 2021 (the “Effective Date”) as set forth in the Notice of (I) Entry of Order Confirming the Debtors’ Fourth Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization and (II) Occurrence of the Effective Date [Docket No. 917]. SUMMARY OF PROFESSIONAL COMPENSATION AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES REQUESTED 11. PSZJ has submitted three monthly fee statements for services rendered and expenses incurred from November 18, 2020 through and including March 31, 2020. PZJ has received payment of 80% of fees and 100% of expenses on account of its first and second monthly fee statements. A summary of the amounts paid to PSZJ in accordance with the Retention Order for the monthly fee statements relating to the Final Fee Period, and the balance due, is set forth as follows:
Table 1 on page 7. Back to List of Tables
Period Fees
Incurred
Expenses
Incurred
Fees Paid Expenses
Paid
11.18.20 –
12.31.20
$239,227.50 $1,239.85 $191,382.00 $1,239.85
01.01.21 –
01.31.21
$121,537.50 $566.10 $97,230.00 $566.10

7

Table 1 on page 8. Back to List of Tables
Period Fees
Incurred
Expenses
Incurred
Fees Paid Expenses
Paid
02.01.21 –
03.31.21
$116,625.50 $445.87 $0.00 $0.00
04.01.21 –
04.15.211
$7,527.50 $31.12 $0.00 $0.00
None $484,918.00 $2,282.94 $288,612.00 $1,805.95
12. PSZJ maintains computerized records of the time spent by all PSZJ attorneys and paraprofessionals in connection with these Chapter 11 Cases. Copies of these computerized records were filed and served with PSZJ’s monthly fee statements in the format and by the procedure specified by the Compensation Procedures Order. Copies of the monthly fee statements together with the time records are attached hereto as Exhibits A-1 through A-3. Copies of the time records for the Stub Period are attached hereto as Exhibit B. RELIEF REQUESTED 13. PSZJ requests that the Court enter an order (the “Order”), substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit G: (a) awarding PSZJ final compensation for professional services provided during the Final Fee Period in the amount of $484,918.00 and reimbursement of expenses in the amount of $2,282.94; (b) authorizing and directing the Debtors to remit payment to PSZJ for such fees and expenses; (d) approving fees and expenses incurred by PSZJ for the period from November 18, 2020 through and including March 31, 2021 and the Stub Period on final basis; and (d) granting such other relief as is appropriate under the circumstances. A summary of hours billed by professional and the rates billed is attached hereto as Exhibit C. A 1 Time records for the period of April 1, 2021 to April 15, 2021 (the “Stub Period”) have not been previously submitted as a monthly fee statement; however, they are included herein as Exhibit B.

8

summary of the hours billed and fees incurred by category is attached hereto as Exhibit D. Attached hereto as Exhibit E is a summary of the expenses incurred by category. THE REQUESTED COMPENSATION SHOULD BE ALLOWED 14. Section 330 provides that a court may award a professional employed under 11 U.S.C § 328 “reasonable compensation for actual, necessary services rendered . . . and reimbursement for actual, necessary expenses.” See 11 U.S.C. Section 330(a)(1). Section 330 also sets forth the criteria for the award of such compensation and reimbursement: In determining the amount of reasonable compensation to be awarded . . . , the court should consider the nature, the extent, and the value of such services, taking into account all relevant factors, including – (A) the time spent on such services; (B) the rates charged for such services; (C) whether the services were necessary to the administration of, or beneficial at the time at which the service was rendered toward the completion of, a case under this title; (D) whether the services were performed within a reasonable amount of time commensurate with the complexity, importance, and nature of the problem, issue, or task addressed; (E) with respect to a professional person, whether the person is board certified or otherwise has demonstrated skill and experience in the bankruptcy field; and (F) whether the compensation is reasonable based on the customary compensation charged by comparably skilled practitioners in cases other than cases under this title. 11 U.S.C. § 330(a)(3). 15. This Final Application substantiates the total amount that PSZJ seeks for fees and expenses in accordance with each element of the customary standards applied to applications. These standards are set forth in (i) Bankruptcy Rule 2016 and (ii) In re First Colonial Corp. of America, 544 F. 2d 1291 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 904 (1977).

9

16. In First Colonial, the Fifth Circuit adopted the following twelve factors to apply to the determination of awards of attorneys’ fees in bankruptcy cases: (i) time and labor required; (ii) the novelty and difficulty of the questions; (iii) the skill requisite to perform the legal service properly; (iv) the preclusion of other employment by the professional due to acceptance of the case; (v) the customary fee; (vi) whether the fee is contingent or fixed; (vii) time limitations imposed by the client or the circumstances; (viii) the amount involved and the results obtained; (ix) the experience, reputation and ability of the attorneys; (x) the “undesirability” of the case; (xi) the nature and length of the professional relationship with the client; and (xii) awards in similar cases. First Colonial, 544 F. 2d at 1298-99. These factors were taken from Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc., 488 F. 2d 714, 717-19 (5th Cir. 1974), a non-bankruptcy case, and are commonly referred to as the “Johnson factors.” The original Johnson factors, as embraced by First Colonial, remain applicable to the determination of reasonableness of fees awarded under the Bankruptcy Code. See 15 King, Collier on Bankruptcy, ¶ 330. 04[3] at 330-35 to 330-41. A majority of the Johnson factors are now codified under Bankruptcy Code Section 330(a). Id. 17. The Fifth Circuit has rejected the “hindsight” or “material benefit” standard that was originally set forth in In re Pro-Snax Distributors, Inc., 157 F. 3d 414 (5th Cir. 1998). In its place, the Fifth Circuit enunciated a new, prospective standard based on whether the services of counsel were reasonably likely to benefit the estate at the time which they were rendered. See In re Woerner, 783 F. 3d 266, 276 (5th Cir. 2015). All services rendered by PSZJ satisfy the Woerner standard because they were reasonably likely to benefit the estate at the time rendered. 18. PSZJ respectfully submits that the services for which it seeks compensation in this Final Application were, at the time rendered, necessary for and beneficial to the Committee and the creditors of the estates, and were rendered to protect and preserve the Debtors’ estates.

10

PSZJ further believes that it performed the services for the Committee economically, effectively, efficiently, and the results obtained benefited not only the Committee, but also the Debtors’ estates and the Debtors’ constituents. PSZJ further submits that the compensation requested herein is reasonable in light of the nature, extent, and value of such services to the Committee and all parties in interest. 19. PSZJ has not received a retainer in these chapter 11 cases. 20. No agreement or understanding exists between PSZJ and any other entity for sharing of any compensation or reimbursement in this case. 21. PSZJ has provided the information required by the Fee Guidelines. 22. PSZJ has served as counsel to the Committee and, in that capacity, has rendered legal services for the benefit of the Debtors’ estates. 23. No previous application for the relief sought herein has been made to this or any other Court. NATURE AND EXTENT OF SERVICES PROVIDED BY PSZJ DURING THE FINAL FEE PERIOD OF NOVEMBER 18 2020 THROUGH APRIL 15, 20212 24. The first Johnson factor examines the time and labor required to perform the legal services rendered. The services rendered by PSZJ during the Final Fee Period can be grouped into the categories set forth below. PSZJ attempted to place the services provided in the category that best relates to such services. However, because certain services may relate to one or more categories, services pertaining to one category may in fact be included in another category. These services performed, by categories, are generally described below; with a more detailed 2 Inclusive of the Stub Period.

11

identification of the actual services provided set forth on the attached Exhibits A-1 through A-3 and Exhibit B. A. Asset Analysis/ Recovery 25. Time billed to this category relates to asset analysis and recovery issues. During the Final Fee Period, the Firm, among other things: (1) reviewed and analyzed documents in Pantera lawsuit; (2) reviewed and analyzed issues regarding COVID relief legislation and its impact on theater operators; (3) reviewed and analyzed preference information; and (4) corresponded and conferred regarding asset analysis and creditor recoveries. Total Fees: $22,154.00 Total Hours: 24.40 B. Asset Disposition 26. Time billed to this category relates to the Debtors’ efforts to sell substantially all of their assets as an alternative to a plan of reorganization. During the Final Fee Period, the Firm, among other things: (1) reviewed and analyzed a bid procedures motion and order; (2) reviewed and analyzed information regarding a potential bidders; (3) prepared informal objection to bid procedures; (4) prepared for and attended a hearing on bid procedures issues; (5) reviewed and analyzed a de minimis asset disposition motion; (6) reviewed and analyzed objections to a personal property motion; (7) reviewed and analyzed sale process issues; and (8) corresponded and conferred regarding asset disposition issues. Total Fees: $30,636.00 Total Hours: 33.20 C. Bankruptcy Litigation 27. Time billed to this category primarily relates to motions and adversary proceedings in the Bankruptcy Court. During the Final Fee Period, the Firm among other things, reviewed and analyzed issues regarding Pantera, and conferred regarding litigation issues.

12

Total Fees: $2,428.00 Total Hours: 2.40 D. Case Administration 28. This category relates to work regarding administration of this case. During the Final Fee Period, the Firm, among other things: (1) maintained a work-in-progress memorandum and prepared for and participated in conferences regarding work-in-progress issues; (2) performed work regarding pro hac vice motions; (3) corresponded and conferred regarding case administration issues; (4) performed work regarding Committee by-laws; (5) performed work regarding a notice of appearance; (6) maintained a memorandum of critical dates; (7) performed work regarding the selection of Committee financial advisors; (8) performed work regarding a memorandum of pending motions; (9) performed work regarding a Committee information motion; (10) performed work regarding a weekly summary of pleadings; (11) prepared for and participated in telephonic conferences with attorneys for the Debtors regarding case status issues; (12) reviewed and analyzed issues regarding Second Day Motions; (13) reviewed and analyzed discovery issues; (14) reviewed and analyzed financing and sale issues; and (15) prepared for and participated in telephonic conferences with the Committee and the Debtors’ professionals regarding case status issues. Total Fees: $50,978.50 Total Hours: 70.50 E. Claims Administration/Objections 29. Time billed to this category relates to work regarding claims administration and claims objection issues. During the Final Fee Period, the Firm, among other things: (1) reviewed and analyzed issues regarding critical vendors; (2) reviewed and analyzed a motion to establish an administration claims bar date; and (3) corresponded regarding claim issues. Total Fees: $467.50 Total Hours: 0.50

13

F. Employee Benefits/Pension 30. Time billed to this category relates to work regarding employee benefits, pension plans, and other employee issues. During the Final Fee Period, the Firm, among other things, reviewed and analyzed a Key Employee Incentive Program Motion and the United States Trustee’s opposition to that motion, and corresponded regarding employee issues. Total Fees: $420.00 Total Hours: 0.60 G. Executory Contracts 31. Time billed to this category relates to work regarding executory contracts and unexpired leases of real property. During the Final Fee Period, the Firm, among other things: (1) performed work regarding an objection to a rent abatement motion; (2) performed work regarding a list of leases and their status; (3) attended to issues regarding a lease abatement order; (4) reviewed and analyzed a motion to compel; (5) reviewed and analyzed an objection to assumption of executory contract; (6) reviewed and analyzed issues regarding rejected leases; and (7) conferred and corresponded regarding executory contract issues. Total Fees: $17,477.50 Total Hours: 23.10 H. Financial Filings 32. This category relates to issues regarding compliance with reporting requirements. During the Final Fee Period, the Firm, among other things, reviewed and analyzed Schedules and Statements and prepared a summary, and corresponded regarding financial filings issues. Total Fees: $16,683.50 Total Hours: 33.50

14

I. Financing 33. This category relates to issues regarding debtor in possession (“DIP”) financing and use of cash collateral. During the Final Fee Period, the Firm, among other things: (1) reviewed and analyzed pleadings and drafted a memorandum of DIP loan issues; (2) performed work regarding a DIP loan objection; (3) performed work regarding a final DIP financing order; (4) reviewed and analyzed budget issues; (5) reviewed and analyzed issues regarding cash flow projections; (6) reviewed and analyzed lien and prepared a lien perfection memorandum; (7) prepared lien challenge stipulation; (8) reviewed and analyzed DIP financing amendment; and (9) corresponded and conferred regarding financing issues. Total Fees: $88,579.00 Total Hours: 88.10 J. General Creditors’ Committee 34. This category relates primarily to communications with the Committee regarding the various filings and strategies of these cases. During the Final Fee Period, the Firm, among other things: (1) performed work regarding the selection of a Committee financial advisor; (2) prepared for and participated in weekly status calls with the Committee and its professionals; (3) communicated with Committee members regarding case status issues; (4) prepared for and attended teleconferences with the Debtors’ professionals regarding case issues; (5) performed work regarding case update memoranda for the Committee; (6) performed work regarding a creditor website; (7) reviewed and analyzed case updates from Dundon; (8) reviewed and analyzed Plan and Disclosure Statement issues; and (9) corresponded and conferred regarding Committee issues. Total Fees: $31,596.50 Total Hours: 35.10

15

K. Hearing 35. Time billed to this category relates to the preparation and attendance at hearings held during the Final Fee Period, including hearings on DIP financing, rent abatement, critical vendor, bid procedures and sale, retention application, lease, and Plan and Disclosure Statement issues. Total Fees: $43,842.00 Total Hours: 48.00 L. Meeting of Creditors 36. This category relates to issues regarding meeting of creditors issues. During the Final Fee Period, the Firm, among other things: (1) reviewed and analyzed issues regarding a Section 341(a) meeting of creditors; (2) prepared for and participated in telephonic meetings with the Committee; and (3) conferred and corresponded regarding meeting of creditors issues. Total Fees: $9,388.50 Total Hours: 7.90 M. Plan and Disclosure Statement 37. This category relates to issues regarding a Plan of Reorganization (“Plan”) and Disclosure Statement. During the Final Fee Period, the Firm, among other things: (1) reviewed and analyzed a Plan and Disclosure Statement and prepared a memorandum for the Committee summarizing the Plan and Disclosure Statement; (2) performed work regarding a request for production of documents related to Plan and Disclosure Statement issues; (3) performed work regarding an objection to Disclosure Statement; (4) prepared for and participated in a meet and confer with Debtors’ counsel regarding the request for production of documents; (5) negotiate consensual plan and performed work regarding revisions to the Plan and Disclosure Statement; (6) draft Plan support letter; (7) review and comment on Disclosure Statement order; (8) prepared for and attended a hearing on the Disclosure Statement on February 12, 2021; (9) draft a liquidating

16

trust agreement; (10) prepared for and attended a hearing on February 22, 2021 regarding a motion to amend the Plan; (11) reviewed and analyzed confirmation objections; (12) review and comment on confirmation order; (13) prepared for and attended a Plan confirmation hearing on March 26, 2021; and (14) conferred and corresponded regarding Plan and Disclosure Statement issues. Total Fees: $155,175.50 Total Hours: 153.90 N. PSZ&J Compensation 38. Time billed to this category relates to the compensation of the Firm. During the Final Fee Period, the Firm, among other things: (1) performed work regarding a notice of rate increase; (2) performed work regarding an interim fee notice; and (3) attended to monthly fee statement issues. Total Fees: $1,882.00 Total Hours: 2.70 O. PSZ&J Retention 39. Time billed to this category relates to the retention of the Firm. During the Final Fee Period, the Firm, among other things, performed work regarding the Firm’s retention application and a supplemental declaration. Total Fees: $3,921.00 Total Hours: 6.30 P. Relief from Stay/ Stay Litigation 40. This category relates to issues regarding the automatic stay and relief from stay motions. During the Final Fee Period, the Firm, among other things, reviewed and analyzed a relief from stay motion filed by a landlord, and performed work regarding a joinder. Total Fees: $2,127.00 Total Hours: 2.00

17

Q. Retention of Professionals 41. Time billed to this category relates to the retention of estate professionals. During the Final Fee Period, the Firm, among other things: (1) performed work regarding the selection of a financial advisor for the Committee; (2) reviewed and analyzed retention applications and the United States Trustee’s objections to retention applications; (3) performed work regarding the Dundon retention application; (4) performed work regarding the Firm’s retention application; and (5) corresponded regarding retention issues. Total Fees: $4,688.00 Total Hours: 5.20 R. Tax Issues 42. Time billed to this category relates to tax issues. During the Final Fee Period, the Firm, among other things, reviewed and analyzed tax discovery issues, corresponded and conferred regarding tax issues. Total Fees: $ 2,473.50 Total Hours: 2.30 ADDITIONAL STANDARDS FOR AWARDING OF ATTORNEY’S FEES 43. Novelty and Difficulty of Legal Problems Involved. The second Johnson factor examines the degree of novelty and difficulty of the issues encountered by PSZJ. With respect to the matters described herein, numerous difficult and complex legal problems have been addressed and considered by PSZJ, all of which have required knowledge of the application of the Bankruptcy Code, the Bankruptcy Rules and court decisions interpreting the same. 44. Skill Required for Performance of Legal Services. The third Johnson factor examines the skill requisite to perform the legal services properly. The number of difficult issues and matters addressed in these cases required a high degree of skill and expertise. PSZJ’s attorneys, with varying levels of experience and seniority, have been used effectively and

18

efficiently to perform the tasks assigned to them and have provided valuable and effective assistance to the Committee. A thorough understanding of the Bankruptcy Code and Bankruptcy Rules was blended with business expertise to assist the Committee. The compensation requested by PSZJ is consistent with the compensation awarded in other cases of similar size and complexity. 45. Preclusion of Other Employment. The fourth Johnson factor is whether the professionals are precluded from taking other employment due to the acceptance of this case. PSZJ’s senior professionals devoted substantial time to this engagement, during which time they were precluded from taking on additional work. 46. Customary Fee. The fifth Johnson factor to be considered is the reasonable hourly rate by which the reasonable number of hours expended by PSZJ are to be multiplied. Subsumed in this analysis are the following guidelines, as noted in Johnson: the customary fee charged by the applicant, awards in similar cases, the level of skill necessary, the amount involved, the results obtained, the reputation of the professional and the undesirability of the case. 47. PSZJ’s hourly billing rates, as set out in Exhibit C, are computed at the rates PSZJ regularly charges its hourly clients. The hourly rates charged by PSZJ are commensurate with the customary fees charged by professionals of similar experience, reputation and abilities in this community, as well as those rates charged regionally and nationally. Additionally, the hourly rates charged by PSZJ are consistent with the amount of time involved in these cases, the results obtained by PSZJ, and the level of skill necessary to perform the work. Accordingly, the hourly billing rates charged by PSZJ are reasonable. 48. Contingent Nature of Fees. The sixth Johnson factor examines whether the fee is contingent or fixed. No contingent fees are requested in these cases.

19

49. Time Limitations Imposed by the Case. The seventh Johnson factor is whether the time limitations imposed by the case resulted in a disproportionate allocation of resources. The time demands of this representation have not resulted in a disproportionate allocation of resources by PSZJ. 50. Results Obtained. The eighth Johnson factor is the amount involved and the results obtained. PSZJ has diligently worked for the Committee by, among other things, (i) ensuring all pleadings were correct and properly filed, (ii) communicating with the Committee and other parties in interest concerning the case; (iii) assisting the Committee in connection with its investigation of the Debtors, and retention of professionals; and (iv) engaging in extensive negotiations, ultimately resulting in a global case resolution that is embodied in the terms of the Plan. These cases have been handled in a professional and cost effective manner. The requested compensation is reasonable based on the time expended, the parties involved, and the results obtained in the case to date. 51. Experience, Reputation, and Ability of PSZJ. The ninth Johnson factor is the experience, reputation, and ability of the attorneys. PSZJ’s attorneys, over many years, have appeared in bankruptcy courts throughout the United States providing legal representation to trustees, debtors, secured creditors, unsecured creditors, and creditors’ committees in proceedings under the Bankruptcy Code. Further, partners of PSZJ, including those who have provided legal services in the instant cases, have for many years actively participated in leadership positions in local, state and national bar associations, and have written for local and national publications and spoken at local, state and national institutes for continuing legal education in the creditors’ rights and bankruptcy areas. PSZJ’s attorneys are experienced in all aspects of bankruptcy matters, possess a high level of expertise, and have an excellent reputation in the business and legal

20

communities. Furthermore, PSZJ has particular experience in the areas of insolvency, workout and corporate reorganization. 52. The fees and expenses requested from November 18, 2020 through and including April 15, 2021 (including the Stub Period) total $487,200.94, which amount consists of $484,918.00 in fees and expenses of $2,282.94. PSZJ rendered 539.70 hours in legal services to the Committee during the Final Fee Period. 53. As shown by this Final Application and supporting exhibits, PSZJ spent its time economically and without unnecessary duplication of time. For the convenience of the Court and all parties in interest, attached as Exhibit F is a comparison of blended hourly rates, as required by the Fee Guidelines. Exhibit D is a summary of the hours expended by the attorneys and paraprofessionals during the Final Fee Period. 54. The following statement is provided pursuant to ¶ C.5. of the Fee Guidelines. a. Question: Did you agree to any variations from, or alternatives to, your standard or customary billing rates, fees or terms for services pertaining to this engagement that were provided during the Final Fee Period? If so, please explain. Response: No. b. Question: If the fees sought in this Final Application as compared to the fees budgeted for the time period covered by this Final Application are higher by 10% or more, did you discuss the reasons for the variation with the client? Response: N/A c. Question: Have any of the professionals included in this Final Application varied their hourly rate based on the geographic location of the bankruptcy case? Response: No. d. Question: Does the Final Application include time or fees related to reviewing or revising time records or preparing, reviewing, or revising invoices? (This is limited to work involved in preparing and editing billing records that would not be compensable outside of bankruptcy and does not include reasonable fees for preparing a fee application.). If so, please quantify by hours and fees. Response: No.

21

e. Question: Does this Final Application include time or fees for reviewing time records to redact any privileged or other confidential information? If so, please quantify by hours and fees. Response: No. f. If the Final Application includes any rate increases since retention: (i) Question: Did your client review and approve those rate increases in advance? Response: N/A. (ii) Question: Did your client agree when retaining the law firm to accept all future rate increases? If not, did you inform your client that they need not agree to modified rates or terms in order to have you continue the representation, consistent with ABA Formal Ethics Opinion 11-458? Response: Yes. The terms of the Firm’s engagement provides that the Firm may periodically adjust its billing rates. 55. PSZJ requests that this Court award (i) PSZJ final fees and expenses in the amount of $487,200.94 for the period of November 18, 2020 through and including March 31, 2021 (and the Stub Period) as an administrative expense claim against the Debtors’ estates, which amount consists of $484,918.00 in fees and $2,282.94 in expenses. 56. These fees and costs were necessary for the proper and successful administration of these chapter 11 cases. PSZJ made every effort to keep all fees and costs to a minimum. 57. The following is a brief explanation of the expenses incurred by PSZJ: a. PSZJ charged for photocopying, scanning and printing at the rate of $0.10 per page. b. PSZJ charged for online research. With respect to providers of on-line legal research services (e.g., LEXIS, Bloomberg and Pacer), PSZJ charges the standard usage rates these providers charge for computerized legal research. PSZJ bills its clients the actual amounts charged by such services, with no premium. Any volume discount received by PSZJ is passed on to the client. c. PSZJ charged for conference calls and telephonic Court appearances. Such rates are billed at actual amounts charged by such service providers, with no premium.

22

g. PSZJ charged for the use of a research service. Such rates are billed at actual amounts charged by such service providers, with no premium. Any volume discount received by PSZJ is passed on to the client. d. PSZJ charged for court reporting and transcription services. Such rates are billed at actual amounts charged by such service providers, with no premium. Any volume discount received by PSZJ is passed on to the client. 58. At all times covered by this Final Application, PSZJ diligently fulfilled its duty as counsel for the Committee. All services rendered by PSZJ benefitted the estates at the time that such services were rendered. Services performed by PSZJ throughout these cases were done in a professional, skilled and expeditious manner, requiring substantially less time than would have been required by counsel with less experience. Every action of PSZJ was taken to reduce the legal hours expended and matters not demanding the services of senior attorneys were assigned to counsel, associates, or paralegals. 59. No agreement exists between PSZJ and any other person, firm or entity for division or sharing of compensation in these cases. 60. The above narrative portion of this Final Application is primarily intended to serve as a summary recapitulation of the major areas of PSZJ’s activities and responsibilities. The exhibits provide complete recapitulations of the acts taken by PSZJ on behalf of the Committee during these cases. NO PRIOR REQUEST 61. No prior request for the relief sought in this Final Application has been made to this or any other court. WHEREFORE, PSZJ respectfully requests that the Court enter an Order: (a) awarding PSZJ final compensation for professional services provided and reimbursement of expenses incurred during the Final Fee Period in the amount of $487,200.94, consisting of

23

(i) $484,918.00 in fees and (ii) $2,282.94 in expenses; and (b) authorizing and directing the Debtors to remit payment to PSZJ for such fees and costs.

24

Dated: June 1, 2021 Respectfully submitted, NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT US LLP By: /s/ Ryan E. Manns Kristian W. Gluck (SBT 24038921) Ryan E. Manns (SBT 24041391) Laura L. Smith (SBT 24066039) 2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 3600 Dallas, Texas 75201-7932 Tel: (214) 855-8000 Facsimile: (214) 855-8200 kristian.gluck@nortonrosefulbright.com ryan.manns@nortonrosefulbright.com laura.smith@nortonrosefulbright.com Local Counsel to the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors -and- PACHULSKI STANG ZIEHL & JONES LLP Jeffrey N. Pomerantz (admitted pro hac vice) Maxim B. Litvak (SBT 24002482) 10100 Santa Monica Boulevard, 13th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90067 Tel: (310) 277-6910 Facsimile: (310) 201-0760 jpomerantz@pszjlaw.com mlitvak@pszjlaw.com Robert J. Feinstein (admitted pro hac vice) Steven W. Golden (SBT 24099681) 780 Third Avenue, 34th Floor New York, NY 10017 Tel: (212) 561-7700 Facsimile: (212) 561-7777 rfeinstein@pszjlaw.com sgolden@pszjlaw.com Lead Counsel to the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors

25

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on June 1, 2021 notice of this document will be electronically mailed to the parties that are registered or otherwise entitled to receive electronic notices in this case pursuant to the Electronic Filing Procedures in this District and mailed to the parties listed on the attached Complex Service List (as of April 1, 2021). /s/ Ryan E. Manns One of Counsel PROOF OF TRANSMITTAL TO THE U.S. TRUSTEE The undersigned declares, under the penalty of perjury, that on June 1, 2021, I caused to be served a true and correct copy of the forgoing pleading to the United States Trustee for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, via First Class, United States Mail, to the United States Trustee, 1100 Commerce Street, Room 976, Dallas, Texas 75242. /s/ Robert J. Feinstein Partner CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE I, ______, certify on June 1, 2021 that I have read the foregoing Final Application and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, formed after reasonable inquiry, the compensation and expense reimbursement sought is in conformity with the Guidelines for Compensation and Expenses Reimbursement of Professionals in Chapter 11 Cases, except as specifically noted herein. Further, I certify that the compensation and expense reimbursement requested in this Final Application are billed at rates in accordance with practices no less favorable than those customarily employed by PSZJ and generally accepted by clients of PSZJ. PSZJ did not agree to any variations from, or alternatives to its standard or customary billing rates, fees, or terms for services pertaining to this engagement that were provided during the Final Fee Period. PSZJ did not have a budget related to this engagement. No professionals included in this Final Application varied their hourly rate based on the geographic location of the Chapter 11 Cases. This Final Application does not include time or fees related to reviewing or revising time records or preparing, reviewing, or revising invoices, which would not be compensable outside of bankruptcy, with the exception of reasonable fees related to preparing the Monthly Fee Statements and this Final Application. This Final Application includes de minimus time or fees related to reviewing time records to redact any privilege or confidential information. /s/ Robert J. Feinstein Partner

26