HTML Document View

Full title: Order Dismissing Document for Lack of Compliance (related document(s): 1132 Response in Opposition filed by Levi G. McCathern II for Creditor 1776 Energy Partners, L.L.C. (related document(s): 1044 Amended First Omnibus Objection to Duplicative Claims, with Notice thereof, (30-Day Objection Language) filed by David W. Parham for Debtor First River Energy, LLC (related document(s): 1041 First Omnibus Objection to Duplicate Claims (30-Day Objection Language) filed by David W. Parham for Debtor First River Energy, LLC))) (Order entered on 8/20/2021) (Luna, Emilio)

Document posted on Aug 19, 2021 in the bankruptcy, 2 pages and 0 tables.

Bankrupt11 Summary (Automatically Generated)

San Antonio Division N RE: First River Energy, LLC , Debtor(s) Case No.:18−50085−cag ORDER DISMISSING PLEADING (ECF NO. 1132) FOR LACK OF COMPLIANCEWITH LOCAL RULES oc # 1132 − Response in Opposition filed by Levi G. McCathern II for Creditor 1776 Energy Partners, L.L. Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A) (McCathern, Levi) (related document(s): 1044 Amended First Omnibusbjection to Duplicative Claims, with Notice thereof, (30−Day Objection Language) filed by David W. Parhaor Debtor First River Energy, LLC (related document(s): 1041 First Omnibus Objection to Duplicate Claims30−Day Objection Language) filed by David W. Parham for Debtor First River Energy, LLC))pon consideration thereof, the court notes that the filing is deficient in the following respects: The pleading does not include the signer's mailing address, telephone number and area code.The certificate of service must be signed by an attorney or party (if appearing without counsel), certifyinhat service has been accomplished in the manner and on the date stated in the certificate and upon the partiesequired to be served. The pleading lacks the proposed form of order attached as an exhibit to the motion, see Local Rule 9013(b)evised 11/1/2013.

List of Tables

Document Contents

IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED and DECREED that the below described is SO ORDERED. Dated: August 20, 2021. ________________________________________ CRAIG A. GARGOTTA UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE ______________________________________________________________UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT Western District of Texas San Antonio Division N RE: First River Energy, LLC , Debtor(s) Case No.:18−50085−cag Chapter No.:11 ORDER DISMISSING PLEADING (ECF NO. 1132) FOR LACK OF COMPLIANCEWITH LOCAL RULES oc # 1132 − Response in Opposition filed by Levi G. McCathern II for Creditor 1776 Energy Partners, L.L. Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A) (McCathern, Levi) (related document(s): 1044 Amended First Omnibusbjection to Duplicative Claims, with Notice thereof, (30−Day Objection Language) filed by David W. Parhaor Debtor First River Energy, LLC (related document(s): 1041 First Omnibus Objection to Duplicate Claims30−Day Objection Language) filed by David W. Parham for Debtor First River Energy, LLC))pon consideration thereof, the court notes that the filing is deficient in the following respects: The pleading does not include the signer's mailing address, telephone number and area code. The filing is not accompanied by the requisite form of notice. The Chapter 13 plan does not comply with Standing Order 17−02 which requires that the current District Formhapter 13 plan be filed in all Chapter 13 cases with petition dates on and after November 1, 2017. The debtor haseven (7) days from the date of this order to file a District Form Chapter 13 plan. Failure to comply may result in thease being dismissed without further notice. The Standing Order and District Form Chapter 13 plan may be found at ttp://www.txwb.uscourts.gov/official−forms−western−district−texas . The Chapter 13 Plan must have an appropriate certificate of service, which lists each party served and its address The pleading lacks the appropriate and/or no certificate of service per Local Rule 9013(c): (1) The certificate of service must be signed by an attorney or party (if appearing without counsel), certifyinhat service has been accomplished in the manner and on the date stated in the certificate and upon the partiesequired to be served. (2) The certificate of service must list each of the entities served and their addresses. (3) With Court approval, a party may serve a summary of a pleading where the pleading is voluminous, orhe number of parties to be served is excessively large. In such cases, the summary shall be filed, and the certificate

1

The filing states an incorrect time for notice to file objections, see Local Rule 9014(a) revised 11/1/2013. The filing states an incorrect time for notice to file objections, see Local Rule 4001(a)(2) regarding motions forelief from stay as revised 11/1/2013. The pleading lacks the appropriate certificate of conference pursuant to Local Rules 9014(e) and 9014(f). The pleading lacks the proposed form of order attached as an exhibit to the motion, see Local Rule 9013(b)evised 11/1/2013. The pleading lacks the separately uploaded proposed order, see Local Rule 9013(b) revised 11/1/2013. The Objection to Claim is not in compliance with the Standing Order Regarding Objections to Proofs of Claim. The filing is not in compliance with the current Official Bankruptcy Form(s). An objection to exemption must be served on all parties. Other(describe): he court concludes that the filing should be dismissed without prejudice to its refiling. So ORDERED. ###

2