HTML Document View

Full title: Certification of Counsel Regarding Wind-Down Administrator's Eighth (8th) Omnibus (Substantive) Objection to Claims Pursuant to Section 502 of the Bankruptcy Code, Bankruptcy Rule 3007, and Local Rule 3007-1 (related document(s)1635) Filed by Wind-Down Administrator. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A # 2 Exhibit B) (Feldman, Betsy) (Entered: 08/26/2021)

Document posted on Aug 25, 2021 in the bankruptcy, 2 pages and 0 tables.

Bankrupt11 Summary (Automatically Generated)

In re: Case No. 20-10010 (CSS) BDC Inc., et al., (Jointly Administered) Debtors.1 Ref.To afford the parties additional 1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases, along with the last four digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, are: BDC Inc. (1509); BDC Holdings, LLC (8504); ND, LLC (9109); BDC of Alabama, LLC (5598); BDC of Cincinnati, LLC (1334); BTC of Cincinnati, LLC (3462); BDC of Florida, LLC (5168); BDC of Kentucky, LLC (7392); BDC of Louisiana, LLC (4109); BDC of Madisonville, LLC (7310); BDC of Ohio, LLC (2720); BTC of Ohio, LLC (7837); BDC of South Carolina, LLC (0963); BDC of Texas, LLC (5060); CAS, LLC (9109); GSSD, LLC (9109); NDHT, LLC (7480); and BDC of Madisonville Sub, LLC (0314). 8525268.1 time to discuss the Response, the Debtors and the Respondent have agreed to adjourn the Objection as it pertains to Disputed Claim 70086 to the hearing scheduled for September 29, 2021.So as not to delay the Court’s consideration of the Objection (which is scheduled to be heard on September 1, 2021) as it pertains to the Disputed Claims that are not subject of the Response, the Wind-Down Administrator has revised the Proposed Order (the “Revised Proposed Order”) to remove the Disputed Claim that is the subject of the Response. For the convenience of the Court and other interested parties, a blackline comparing the Revised Proposed Order against the Proposed Order is attached hereto as Exhibit B.3 WHEREFORE, the Wind-Down Administrator respectfully requests that the Court enter the Revised Proposed Order at the earliest convenience of the Court without further notice or hearing.

List of Tables

Document Contents

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Chapter 11 In re: Case No. 20-10010 (CSS) BDC Inc., et al., (Jointly Administered) Debtors.1 Ref. Docket No. 1635 CERTIFICATION OF COUNSEL REGARDING WIND-DOWN ADMINISTRATOR’S EIGHTH (8TH) OMNIBUS (SUBSTANTIVE) OBJECTION TO CLAIMS PURSUANT TO SECTION 502 OF THE BANKRUPTCY CODE, BANKRUPTCY RULE 3007, AND LOCAL RULE 3007-1 On August 3, 2021, the Wind-Down Administrator in the above-captioned cases filed the Wind-Down Administrator’s Eighth (8th) Omnibus (Substantive) Objection to Claims Pursuant to Section 502 of the Bankruptcy Code, Bankruptcy Rule 3007, and Local Rule 3007-1 [D.I. 1635] (the “Objection”).2 A proposed form of order was attached to the Objection as Exhibit 2 (the “Proposed Order”). The deadline to respond to the Objection was August 16, 2021 at 4:00 p.m. (ET) (the “Response Deadline”). The Response Deadline was extended to August 23, 2021 at 4:00 p.m. for Hogan Truck Leasing, Inc. (the “Respondent”). On August 23, 2021, the Respondent filed a response [D.I. 1661] (the “Response”). No other responses to the Objection were filed. To afford the parties additional 1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases, along with the last four digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, are: BDC Inc. (1509); BDC Holdings, LLC (8504); ND, LLC (9109); BDC of Alabama, LLC (5598); BDC of Cincinnati, LLC (1334); BTC of Cincinnati, LLC (3462); BDC of Florida, LLC (5168); BDC of Kentucky, LLC (7392); BDC of Louisiana, LLC (4109); BDC of Madisonville, LLC (7310); BDC of Ohio, LLC (2720); BTC of Ohio, LLC (7837); BDC of South Carolina, LLC (0963); BDC of Texas, LLC (5060); CAS, LLC (9109); GSSD, LLC (9109); NDHT, LLC (7480); and BDC of Madisonville Sub, LLC (0314). The location of the Debtors’ service address is: The Wind-Down Administrator of the Debtors, 700 Canal Street, Suite 12E, Stamford, CT 06902, Attn: David Dunn. 2 All capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein have the meanings ascribed to them in the Objection. 8525268.1

1

time to discuss the Response, the Debtors and the Respondent have agreed to adjourn the Objection as it pertains to Disputed Claim 70086 to the hearing scheduled for September 29, 2021. So as not to delay the Court’s consideration of the Objection (which is scheduled to be heard on September 1, 2021) as it pertains to the Disputed Claims that are not subject of the Response, the Wind-Down Administrator has revised the Proposed Order (the “Revised Proposed Order”) to remove the Disputed Claim that is the subject of the Response. The Revised Proposed Order is attached hereto as Exhibit A. For the convenience of the Court and other interested parties, a blackline comparing the Revised Proposed Order against the Proposed Order is attached hereto as Exhibit B.3 WHEREFORE, the Wind-Down Administrator respectfully requests that the Court enter the Revised Proposed Order at the earliest convenience of the Court without further notice or hearing. Dated: August 26, 2021 YOUNG CONAWAY STARGATT & TAYLOR, LLP Wilmington, Delaware /s/ Betsy L. Feldman M. Blake Cleary (No. 3614) Kenneth J. Enos (No. 4544) Betsy L. Feldman (No. 6410) Rodney Square 1000 North King Street Wilmington, Delaware 19801 Telephone: (302) 571-6600 Facsimile: (302) 571-1256 mbcleary@ycst.com kenos@ycst.com bfeldman@ycst.com Counsel to the Wind-Down Administrator 3 The only revision to the exhibits to the Proposed Order was to remove the Disputed Claim that is the subject of the Response. Accordingly, no blacklines of the exhibits appended to the Revised Proposed Order are attached. 8525268.1

2